Copyright © 2013
levold system design Alle Rechte vorbehalten. |
|
|
systemagazin Zeitschriftenarchiv: Journal of Family Therapy Heft 3/2003
|
1/2003 - 2/2003 - 3/2003 - 4/2003 - Übersicht
Manicom, Hilary & Teresa Boronska (2003): Co-creating change within a child protection system: integrating art therapy with family therapy practice. In: Journal of Family Therapy 25(3), S. 217-232
abstract: This paper considers family art therapy intervention using a partnership developed between an art therapist and a family therapist within a child protection system. The aim of this co-working relationship is to bring together skills that can amplify the child's voice within the family, using art as a means of extending the family story. The use of metaphor adds to the repertoire of skills available when working with families, and offers a particular form of communication in which children can more easily engage. By co-working, we also bring together our personal and professional stories, creating multiple ideas and ways of seeing and taking account of differences in the life experiences of individual families.
Woodcock, Jeremy (2003): Comment - Art therapy and family therapy. In: Journal of Family Therapy 25(3), S. 233-235
Pote, Helen, Peter Stratton, David Cottrell, David Shapiro & Paula Boston (2003): Systemic family therapy can be manualized: research process and findings. In: Journal of Family Therapy 25(3), S. 236-262
abstract: Determining the efficacy of therapeutic interventions is becoming an increasing political and ethical necessity. Comparative therapeutic outcome trials are most powerful when there is a precise specification, or manualization, of the forms that therapies took. Manuals have begun to be developed for structural/behavioural family therapy and couple therapy. The development of these manuals is often reliant on experts' self-report, rather than a systematic analysis of the therapeutic process as it happens. This can limit their validity and applicability to standard clinical practice. In addition, no manuals exist which reflect less structured forms of family therapy aimed at incorporating systemic, postmodern and narrative frameworks. The feasibility of producing a workable manual that reflects the fluidity of such practices has been questioned. A research project to systematically create and test such a manual is reported. Multiple data sources and research methods, primarily qualitative, were applied to generate a rich specification of the therapy. In reporting these results the contents of various aspects of the final manual are indicated. Procedures to ensure that the prescribed practice is consistent with a widely used approach to systemic family therapy are also described. The manual will be an important tool for outcome research and therapeutic practice. The account of the research process should be helpful to researchers engaged in constructing a manual for other models of family therapy based on a rigorous analysis of actual practice. The manual itself is available for use by outcome researchers who wish to evaluate this widely used form of systemic family therapy.
Allison, Steve, Kathleen Stacey, Vicki Dadds, Leigh Roeger, Andrew Wood & Graham Martin (2003): What the family brings: gathering evidence for strengths-based work. In: Journal of Family Therapy 25(3), S. 263-284
abstract: Families attending child and adolescent mental health (CAMH) services are often assumed to have problems in key areas such as communication, belonging/acceptance and problem-solving. Family therapy is often directed towards addressing these difficulties. With increasing emphasis in family therapy and human services fields over the last decade on identifying and building from strengths, a different starting point has been advocated. This paper describes a large survey of the self-reported pre-therapy functioning of children and families using a public CAMH service (n=416). Before commencing family therapy parents identified family strengths across a range of key areas, despite the burden of caring for children with moderate to severe mental health problems. This evidence supports theoretical and clinical work that advocates a strengths perspective, and highlights how resilience framed in family (and social) rather than individual terms enables a greater appreciation of how strengths may be harnessed in therapeutic work.
Donovan, Mary (2003): Family therapy beyond postmodernism: some considerations on the ethical orientation of contemporary practice. In: Journal of Family Therapy 25(3), S. 285-306
abstract: Ethics is a subject that is self-evidently important for systemic therapy, as for therapy generally, yet arguably it is one that has not received nearly as much attention in the literature as it warrants. This paper looks at the historical context for the marginalization of ethical discourse and suggests that the contemporary influence of postmodernist and hermeneutic thinking reinforces this tendency. Flaskas' (2002) recent argument for the reclamation of an idea of truth and reality as a social and emotional process is considered, and it is suggested that this needs supplementing with a perspective on truth and reality as an ethical process. Consideration is given to the enduring influence within postmodernist approaches of the modernist Kantian conception of ethics as centred in individual consciousness. I argue that important elements of contemporary systemic practice (for example, the reflecting team approach) are also pointing towards a different formulation of ethics that is focused more specifically on processes of communication. In elaborating this theme the paper draws on the work of the German social theorist Jurgen Habermas who writes on the ethics of communication.
Akister, Jane (2003): Abstracts. In: Journal of Family Therapy 25(3), S. 307-310
Book Reviews. In: Journal of Family Therapy 25(3), S. 311-314
Books Reviewed in this article: Eia Asen, Neil Dawson, and Brenda McHugh, Multiple Family Therapy: The Marlborough Model and its Wider Applications C Christian Beels, 'A Different Story.': The Rise of Narrative in Psychotherapy
|
|
|